In a business, every time a product (defined as a product or service or both) is delivered to a customer there is a cost for that product. The cost may be formally defined and measured by a costing system, or it may be totally undefined. Regardless, “costing” is still in play and is a critical component to any business.
In the end, in simplest terms, a business will succeed if the total of its revenues exceeds the total of its costs. While the prior statement seems so simple that most are now wondering if they should read on further, it’s never as simple as it seems. The dilemma and challenge lie in the definition of “in the end” and how to measure and record the total revenues and costs at any particular point in time so that the judgment regarding success is clear.
Some examples help. Take your average startup, and look at their income statement’s bottom line, or net income, and what do we see? Years of negative numbers. Clearly, they are either a failure or, more likely, “in the end” has not yet arrived. Take your average business and compute the net income daily for three days. Day one was minus 100, day two plus 40 and day three plus 75. Does any one day tell you anything? Do three days tell you anything?
Why do you need a costing system?
The only way to determine what the answer will be “in the end” is to understand what the cost of an individual product actually is (or will be at some point in time). Sum those costs across the mix of what you expect to sell (at your expected price) and then determine if you will be plus or minus “in the end.”
In the words of one of my clients, “Why does this have to be so complicated? I hired you to make this simple.”
Sometimes it is! Take the broker who identifies a customer need, finds a willing supplier, gets a price, marks up that price and has the supplier ship it prepaid to the customer. Price is simple and cost is simple. That business sustains itself until the pressured purchasing agent on the other side starts buying direct because the broker has minimal sustainable competitive advantage or value added.
Advantages that Drive Costing
Several strategic advantages can lead you to the most profitable businesses.
- The producer has advantages in purchasing power or proprietary access to raw ingredients.
- The producer has advantages of scale where resources critical to the production of the product (or delivery of the service) are shared across multiple products.
- The producer has advantages of technology or experience where cumulative experience makes them more productive than others.
- The producer has network advantages where there are external costs to buying competitive products, and these outweigh any price premium the producer may charge.
As we will delve deeper in subsequent articles dealing with practical costing challenges and complexities, it always seems to me that every one of these advantages makes the calculation of “what does it cost” a little more difficult and complex. Fortunately, it is not always imperative in costing to be exactly right – just to be close enough to make good business decisions.
Costing Systems and How They Work
Turning now to the idea of a costing system, how does all this work? Costing systems are typically computerized software packages integrated into a company’s enterprise software. They are fancy tools that total up all the inputs required to make a product.
For a manufacturer, this includes materials you buy, space you rent, utilities you pay to run your ma-chines and heat the building, wages, etc. For services, it can include tangible items such as material and supplies, and it typically includes a significant cost from a service person. However, this isn’t al-ways the case. We are all familiar with SAAS (software as a service), which in most cases involves no service person once past an early installation phase.
In general, there are two costing methods: actual costing and standard costing. Actual costing at-tempts to define and record every cost applied to the product based on the actual hours of labor times, the actual hourly cost of that labor, plus the actual material used (both the right amount used and any wasted) and sometimes as specific as the certain lot of a material. Actual costing in any volume re-quires either an army of clerks or a good IT system, as well as the disciplined entry of actual data into the computer system. In best-in-class actual cost systems, you will see ubiquitous barcode scanners, RFID identification systems and employees swiping in and out of workstations.
Standard costing systems are structured around what the product should cost. Deviations of performance to these standards are measured and adjusted periodically. You may see some of the same information-gathering technology, but the data collected is measured against the standard versus simply collected and totaled.
There are pluses and minuses to either costing approach, which will be addressed in a later article. In the implementation of both, however, the same issues, complexities and general principles apply.
Author Peter Geise is Area President of FocusCFO.
He may be reached at 330- 510-5760 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
For additional information, visit www.FocusCFO.com.